We’re standing in a big empty room in the WINLAB facility on Route 1 in North Brunswick at the Technology Center of New Jersey (www. winlab.rutgers. edu). The room is empty, that is, except for the 400 computers hanging from the ceiling.

Suddenly the ceiling powers on, and the room reverberates with the noise from the fans as the computers boot up, and we watch the status lights flicker across a 20 by 20 array of PCs, spaced 1 meter apart across the 80 by 70 foot room.

This grid of PCs is the ORBIT Lab — the Open-Access Research Testbed for Wireless Networks (www.orbit-lab.org). Each node is a stand-alone PC with two powerful wireless interfaces (plus some additional connections including Bluetooth). And the activity that we are seeing is from a researcher somewhere over the Internet, who is loading the grid with software to run an experiment.

ORBIT has been hugely popular, and a tremendous help to organizations developing new wireless applications. “This facility has 95 percent usage. It gets booted about 30 to 40 times a day. We have about 200 user groups worldwide. There are people logging in from Australia,” says Wade Trappe, associate director at WINLAB and associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at Rutgers University.

WINLAB, the Wireless Information Network Laboratory, is an industry-university cooperative research center for wireless networking, founded at Rutgers University in 1989. It’s designed as an international resource for academics, industry, and government to experiment with new wireless networking technology.

WINLAB moved to its current facility in the Rutgers Technology Center just south of the Cook Campus in 2005, with approximately 18,000 square feet of space, including the large ORBIT laboratory.

But why wireless experiments in New Jersey? The reason, explains Trappe, is that people who had been researching wireless networks did not have a common basis for comparing different designs. Therefore, “you would go to a conference with a new mobile network protocol, and the speaker right after you said almost exactly the same thing with a separate protocol.” It just was too hard to run real experiments. Researchers were using simulations, and it just wasn’t the same thing.

As a result, says Trappe, “the National Science Foundation (NSF) put a push out for better scientific methodology. They created a program called networking research testbeds.” The idea was to find something halfway between building a huge site in which to test out new products on the one hand, and merely running simulations on the other. In the middle came this effort, at a moderate scale, and as a testbed where people could conduct experiments.

The idea, he says, used the “supercomputer model, a common community resource. You reserve your time, log in remotely, conduct your experiment, get your data, and go back to your lab. You can do the work at 2 a.m.”

But how can a fixed grid of computers simulate mobile devices? First, the researcher can “warp the grid” by changing the nodes from which the experiment is transmitting and receiving as if a device were in motion. Second, the testbed includes an array of noise generators that can be programmed to inject background noise into the environment. “We can choreograph the noise,” says Trappe, “raising the noise floor to change the signal-to-noise ratio (or the power ratio between the information being transmitted and any background noise) and raise the interference, so you can see how this system deals with packet losses.”

A similar collaborative project is PlanetLab at Princeton University, which has some 866 nodes at 458 sites spread across the globe (www.planet-lab.org). “PlanetLab is about long-running Internet-based services,” says Trappe. “The timescales we are interested in are much shorter: packet collisions on the scale of milliseconds.”

ORBIT was funded in 2003 by a $5.45 million, four-year grant from NSF. The project is a collaborative effort between several local university research groups: Rutgers, Columbia, and Princeton, along with industrial partners Lucent Bell Labs, IBM Research, and Thomson.

The ORBIT testbed is integrated with PlanetLab to enable complete wired experiments as well as wireless experiments. WINLAB also has ongoing collaborations with other universities, including NJIT, Columbia, Stevens, Carnegie Mellon, the University of Massachusetts, and UCLA.

WINLAB was founded in 1989. Its budget for 2007 was $5 million, up from $1.2 million in 2001. It currently has some 25 faculty and staff, up from 10 in 2001, including faculty from the electrical and computer engineering and the computer science departments at Rutgers (www.ece.rutgers.edu). The work supports some 45 graduate students.

WINLAB continues to receive some 80 percent of its funding from federal grants, but also has developed a corporate sponsorship program. It is currently working with some 15 industry sponsors, including Intel, Qualcomm, Alcatel-Lucent, and Toyota.

“So far it has been pretty successful,” says Trappe. “We average about 10 to 15 sponsors per year.” WINLAB offers two levels of sponsorship, full and associate, for a $70,000 and a $40,000 annual membership fee, respectively. The full level, says Trappe, gives the company a sponsored project. “We will work with them to define a project of common mutual agreement. We’re not doing development for them; we find something that’s good from a research point of view, and which also benefits them. We then map out a year-long project.” Students also benefit from support for thesis research and internships at sponsor companies.

WINLAB prefers to use an open-source model for its software, so that the fruits of research can be shared.

WINLAB originally worked with the cellular companies, but now, says Trappe, “things have changed, and we are now finding nonstandard type companies, not wireless companies, coming to us. We are increasingly finding companies like Toyota, Alpine, and DaimlerChrysler. What they are facing is that they do not have wireless knowledge, but wireless is key to giving them some differentiation in their market.”

For example, he says, “the automotive companies are interested in wireless sensors within the car, wireless communication to roadside beacons, and car-to-car communications.” For collision avoidance, two cars could be exchanging information telling each other to adjust the brakes, or signaling that “at this point in the road I sensed there is a low coefficient of friction, so the information that the road is icy is sent to cars behind you.”

Describing himself as “a Texan by birth, and an applied mathematician by training,” Trappe spends most of his time “in the strange limbo land between mathematics and engineering.” He received his undergraduate degree in mathematics from the University of Texas at Austin in 1994, and his masters and then Ph.D. in applied mathematics and scientific computing from the University of Maryland.

While at Maryland, Trappe came to New Jersey as an engineering intern with Dialogic Corp. (a subsidiary of Intel) in Parsippany in 1997 and 1998, and then joined the department of electrical and computer engineering and WINLAB at Rutgers after his graduation in 2002.

We’ve become rather jaded to the spread of wireless technology, with cell phones that roam the world, Bluetooth headphones, and ubiquitous Wi-Fi Internet hotspots.

But that’s just the beginning — and WINLAB’s focus is now on the challenges of the future of ubiquitous wireless networking with high-speed mobile Internet access, as outlined by Dipankar Raychaudhuri, director of WINLAB and professor of electrical and computer engineering at Rutgers University, at his keynote presentation at the IEEE Sarnoff Symposium held in April at the Nassau Inn in Princeton.

Raychaudhuri held corporate R&D positions in the telecom/networking industry before coming to Rutgers and WINLAB in 2001. He received his bachelor’s degree in electronics & electrical communications from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 1976, and his masters and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from SUNY Stony Brook in 1978 and 1979. He has held executive positions at RCA Laboratories, NEC USA C&C Research Laboratories, and Isospan Wireless, a San Jose company where he was as chief scientist.

Raychaudhuri says that there are some 2.5 billion cell phones (500 million with Internet service), 100 million mobile computers, and 600 million Internet-connected PCs worldwide. He sees over a billion wireless Internet devices by 2010. In particular, as small wireless sensor devices begin to be deployed, some estimates expect 5 to 10 billion units by 2015.

This was the key issue addressed at the Sarnoff Symposium — the need to be ready to deliver high-speed Internet connectivity, including streaming video, to every mobile wireless device by the beginning of the next decade. The challenge was echoed by speakers from the major cellular carriers, including a keynote presentation from Richard Lynch, executive vice president and chief technology officer, Verizon Communications.

Verizon, along with other major international cellular carriers, is planning to deploy LTE (Long Term Evolution) as its fourth generation (“4G”) mobile broadband network technology. Lynch’s vision is to move away from the current combination of different phone and data networks, and start over with a clean slate of a global IP (Internet Protocol) network designed from the ground up as an Internet backbone for digital data. He sees the need to be able to deliver content anywhere, at any time, on any screen.

Lynch sees LTE delivering 10 to 20 Mbps, millions of bits per second, to individual users when deployed in the latter half of 2010, with the potential to support 40 to 100 Mbps. This is the equivalent of delivering the full bandwidth of today’s high-end Verizon FIOS hard-wired fiber optics service to the home — with its high-speed Internet and hundreds of high-definition TV channels — but direct to a wireless mobile device. He sees this as a requirement for meeting the expected demand for applications, including streaming high-quality video, virtual reality teleconferencing, and, in general, 24/7 connectivity and collaboration.

An alternate view of next-generation wireless comes from the WiMAX Association, which has developed the WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) wireless standard to provide high-speed broadband connectivity across long distances. Mobile WiMAX, approved on 2005, is designed to support high-speed mobile Internet access for data-intensive applications such as Internet audio and video, high-definition video, voice over internet (VoIP) telephone, and Internet television (IPTV).

The WiMAX future in the U.S. was clarified in May with the announcement of a merger of Clearwire, founded by cellular pioneer Craig McCaw, with Sprint’s Xohm wireless broadband business, supported by a $3.2 billion investment by five major WiMAX enthusiasts — Intel, Google, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks. Clearwire (www.clearwire.com) plans to deploy the first nationwide mobile WiMAX network.

With embedded WiMAX chipsets coming in laptops, phones, PDAs, mobile Internet devices, and consumer electronic equipment, mobile WiMAX technology is expected to support applications such as live videoconferencing, recorded video, games, and the transfer of large data files.

To satisfy the demand for 4G broadband wireless services, “we need to take a fresh look,” says Raychaudhuri, and move to a “simplified architecture,” built on IP networking. WINLAB will play a key part in this future by addressing some key challenges. These include delivering megabytes per second to each wireless device, and therefore building system capacity to handle gigabytes of bandwidth, essentially providing today’s fiber bandwidth to tomorrow’s mobile devices, and achieving more efficient use of the available spectrum, while co-existing with shared bands and remaining compatible with legacy equipment.

Another challenge is taking advantage of information about the current location of devices to deliver location-aware services, like GPS mapping, to mobile devices, and doing all these while still supporting security and privacy in wireless network services.

Raychaudhuri expects the number of wireless devices to continue to explode because of the need to connect objects in the environment, including sensors, machines, and automobiles, with the network using wireless interfaces. The research at WINLAB has therefore moved beyond cellular telephone to address the demands of this next generation vision of mass-market pervasive computing with ubiquitous mobile wireless devices.

To help make this future a reality WINLAB is concentrating on a number of research areas. One initiative is work on the development of sensor networks. These networks provide high power wireless connectivity with widespread use of ultra low-power and low-cost devices. The challenges with these devices include limited processing speed and transmitting power, intermittent connectivity, and low speed communications. Answers may lie in new technologies, including ZigBee for industrial remote control and UWB for multimedia

Another promising area is cooperative communication between nearby cars driving on a road, for information, safety (cars are breaking up ahead), and confidence (parking). “One hundred million cars will add Internet connectivity in the next 10 years,” says Raychaudhuri.

The larger research problem of building these kinds of rugged “infrastructure-less,” or peer-to-peer networks is that they are self-organizing and work without central coordination points like cell towers or network hubs. These “mesh” networks must be able to dynamically adjust as devices move though an area, adding and removing nodes as they become available, keeping track of the network topology and interconnections between devices, and finding “multi-hop” end-to-end routing connections to reach a distant node by sending a message though several intermediary nodes.

The openness of wireless networks also presents research challenges for security, including authenticating messages to detect spoofing and anomalous traffic from imposters, and defending from radio interference attacks by enhancing resistance to jamming and denial of service attacks.

This is Trappe’s research focus. “When it comes to the security research community,” he says, “most of the work is about provably guaranteeing that you have security, whereas the practicality is whether you have good enough security to stop 95 percent of the bad guys.”

The need for more efficient use of the wireless spectrum drives research into cognitive radio, software-defined radio systems that can reconfigure to communicate on whatever spectrum is available, and with whatever protocol is required.

Raychaudhuri says that what is needed is not more radios, but rather “smart radios.” Current devices already have multiple radios — your laptop may have three (Bluetooth, 802.11 WiFi, and cellular data). Another radio doesn’t need to be added, but rather it would be ideal if it could be replaced by a radio with fast scanning for empty slots of spectrum, agility to use them, and proper etiquette to share with others.

For example, says Trappe, “users like the Department of Defense want mesh type networks with the ability to find an open frequency that won’t interfere with other networks. The networks can begin to negotiate among themselves.”

WINLAB has begun integrating cognitive radio equipment into its ORBIT testbed. Ten GNU Radio boards have already been installed, and the team is developing baseline cognitive radio software so that researchers can experiment with cognitive radio protocols. This software transforms radio nodes from blind executors of predefined protocols to intelligent agents that search out ways to deliver the services a user wants — even if he does not know how to obtain them. A new research project will install some 64 nodes, including WINLAB’s own prototype cognitive radio hardware.

“Cognitive radios are not easy for researchers,” says Trappe. “You need skills like FPGAs (programmable chips), DSPs (arithmetic signal processors), and protocols (low-level networking software). This is not what an assistant or associate professor could necessarily have his hands on. We have integrated our cognitive radio projects into the ORBIT testbed, so you can just log in and use them.”

By using open software (based on Linux) and hardware, says Raychaudhuri, the point is to “create an open platform that can be used for experiments and research. ORBIT is an open wireless box. It can be programmed by the experimenter, and you can get repeatable results, and it’s all accessible over the Internet. You can try out your protocol, your own routing, your own security. It’s a clean slate.

“ORBIT is our contribution to making this vision of the future of the Internet happen. says Raychaudhuri. “It is a very exciting future for networking. Ten years from now you may not recognize many of the protocols and boxes that make up the network. It’s now a time of a lot of innovation and change for our industry, and for young people it’s a great opportunity to get involved. I have only optimistic things to say.”

WINLAB, 671 Route 1 South, North Brunswick 08902; 732-932-6857. D. Raychaudhuri, director.www.winlab.rutgers.edu.

Facebook Comments