Corrections or additions?
This article by Richard K. Rein was prepared for the May 14, 2003 edition of U.S. 1 Newspaper. All rights reserved.
On State Legislation
Every once in a while you hear about your government
doing something — or trying to do something — that makes you
happy to pay your taxes.
That’s the way I felt last week when I read the newspaper report of
the state Assembly considering a bill that would make it against the
law to drive a motor vehicle while simultaneously taking a call on
a hand-held cell phone or fiddling with your radio or CD player, putting
on make-up, reading the newspaper, wolfing down your bagel and coffee,
or tending to the wolfhound in the backseat.
If the legislation becomes law (a similar bill limited only to the
use of hand-held cell phones already has passed in the state Senate),
then the police blotter pages will have references to DWD along with
DWI — driving while distracted will be against the law as surely
as driving while intoxicated, though with lesser penalties.
Of course, whenever you hear anyone praising legislation at the state
level, you can bet that they have some personal axe to grind. I have
use as anyone else, I always remained silent on the subject because
I was as much an offender as anyone. But then three weeks ago I stumbled
into Brookstone at MarketFair and found a hands-free cell phone cradle
that plugs into the cigaret lighter. It was just $30 and it works
— it even turns the phone on automatically when you start the
Since I hardly ever eat in the car, and since the new law would be
one more argument I could use when my kids start fighting in the back
seat, I am more in favor of it than ever.
I began to notice the constant stream of faxes coming into our office
from the state legislators. In the past I have always taken these
faxes, crumpled them up, and used them to play a little office basketball
as I walked past the nearest trash can. But for some reason one caught
my eye that did not make me happy to pay my taxes.
It was a fax from the Assembly Democrats and it announced that the
Assembly’s state government committee had released a measure —
sponsored by William D. Payne, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and Herb Conaway
— that declared February to be "Black History Month" in
New Jersey. Now this seemed strange: February has been Black History
Month for as long as this paper has been in business and our February
issues have been filled with noteworthy cultural events celebrating
the accomplishments and remembering the struggles of the African-American
Even stranger was that the press release was dated February 13, and
it specifically declared February, 2003, as Black History Month. The
release noted that the measure still had to go to the Assembly Speaker,
who would determine "if and when to post it for a floor vote."
What if it took more than 15 days to accomplish that, I wondered.
The month would be over and presumably they would have to start all
over again the next year.
So I began to collect those faxes that come unrelentingly into our
office. Black History Month, relatively speaking, got short shrift
from our legislators. The environment was the subject of many more
pieces of legislation. One such measure would have allocated $11 million
in funding for open space acquisition (the land was located in part
in the legislative district of the bill’s sponsors, Watson Coleman
and Reed Gusciora).
You might applaud the determination of your elected officials in going
after those funds, but if you read beyond the headline of the press
release you discover that the money would be appropriated from not
the highway fund or the state legislators’ retirement fund or expense
allowance but rather from the Garden State Green Acres Preservation
And so it went. My stack of faxes began to cram an in-box I had allotted
to them: Proposed legislation to designate March as Women’s History
Month (dated March 3), to protect homeowners from toxic mold, to increase
penalties for home burglaries, to protect children from dangerous
school bus drivers, to study the role of the Civil Air Patrol in the
state’s homeland security plans, to encourage humane veal rearing
practices, to ensure warrant checks of inmates awaiting release from
prison, to create a "drug cost reduction study" commission,
to implement a color-coding system to prevent incorrect medical gases
to be given to hospital patients, and — last but not least in
my pile — a bill to require all police, campus police, and sheriff’s
officers to undergo psychological testing before employment and every
five years thereafter.
Operating on the premise that you should not say anything about someone
unless you can say something nice, I didn’t know what to do with all
this onslaught of government protectionism. Then I saw that news about
the DWD offense: Thanks again, legislators, for all your good work.
Corrections or additions?
This page is published by PrincetonInfo.com
— the web site for U.S. 1 Newspaper in Princeton, New Jersey.